top of page

Welcome to Crime and Justice News

Experts: Place-Based Strategies Are Effective, Central to Police Reform

Photo By U.S. Marshal Service

By Cynthia Lum, Christopher Koper, David Weisburd, Robin Engel, John Eck, Anthony Braga, John

MacDonald, Rod Brunson, and Michael Smith

A recent Washington Post article asserts that place-based policing approaches led to Breonna

Taylor’s death. This claim is unsubstantiated and wrong both legally and scientifically. And, it fuels

policy that hurts communities of color where high-quality police services are most needed. Let there

be no mistake; a botched no-knock warrant led to Breonna Taylor’s death, not place-based policing.

Place-based approaches are grounded in research showing that crime is highly concentrated within

most of any community is reasonably safe from serious crime.

Crime concentrates at these locations due to intersecting routines of potential victims and possible offenders. And if crime concentrates, it makes sense to focus on the specific areas where it does, rather than spread police across neighborhoods.

According to two National Academies of Sciences reviews conducted in 2004 and 2018 on a

multitude of research studies, place-based policing is one of the most evidence-based and

scientifically supported approaches police can take to prevent crime in their communities. But what

police do at these locations matters greatly. Place-based approaches are complex and specific.

An over-emphasis on aggressive enforcement or simply “flooding” a place with cops aren’t smart hot

spots approaches. Instead, place-based approaches require good analysis and a deep understanding of

the factors contributing to persistent crime problems and their solutions. Once identified, regular

police presence emphasizing problem-solving prevention work and community engagement works

best at preventing crime at these locations. This includes focusing on the small number of people

driving crime problems in these places.

Place-based policing doesn’t just involve law enforcement; it includes working with residents,

businesses, and other agencies to make places safer. Feedback from communities most affected is

also critical; indeed, hot spots are often identified based on citizen calls for service, reflecting areas

of intense community concern.

The place network investigations (PNI) of Prof. Tamara Herold of the University of Nevada at Las Vegas align with these principles. The PNI strategy is specifically designed to improve community health and

resiliency in historically disenfranchised and vulnerable neighborhoods.

In the absence of place-based strategies, there are few evidence-based alternatives. Police would have

to fall back on general enforcement, chasing offenders, and responding to calls, tactics that contribute

little to safety and remove police further from the community. These tactics have led to the current

police-community crisis, so we should not go back.

Place-focused approaches in policing bring communities a more thoughtful and high-quality

approach to policing than traditional policing approaches which are often unfocused across

communities. The science supports police adopting place-based approaches. Ignoring the needs of

these places would be irresponsible and contribute to higher victimization.

The authors are criminologists and policing scholars from George Mason University (Lum, Koper,

and Weisburd), the University of Cincinnati (Engel and Eck), the University of Pennsylvania (Braga

and MacDonald), the University of Maryland (Brunson), and the University of Texas at San Antonio (Smith).


Recent Posts

See All


A daily report co-sponsored by Arizona State University, Criminal Justice Journalists, and the National Criminal Justice Association

bottom of page