top of page

Welcome to Crime and Justice News

Trump Asks Appeals Court To Throw Out Election Interference Case

Lawyers for former President Trump asked a federal appeals court to throw out a case alleging interference in the 2020 election, arguing that he is immune from prosecution. "Under our system of separated powers, the Judicial Branch cannot sit in judgment over a President's official acts," they wrote in a brief filed Saturday night with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, NPR reports. The move came a day after the Supreme Court declined to fast track the dispute over Trump's immunity from prosecution. Special counsel Jack Smith made that plea for urgency in a bid to keep his criminal case against Trump on track for trial starting March 4. The election interference case is on hold while the question over immunity plays out. The appeals court has agreed to work quickly, with oral arguments scheduled for Jan. 9.

In their brief, Trump's lawyers argue that no current or former president may be criminally prosecuted for "official acts" unless they have been impeached and convicted by the Senate. Because that did not happen to Trump, they write, he has "absolute immunity." They also call the indictment "unlawful and unconstitutional" and warn that it "threatens to launch cycles of recrimination and politically motivated prosecution that will plague our Nation for many decades to come." Special counsel Smith alleged that Trump went well beyond official duties as he waged a months long campaign to overturn the 2020 election results, falsely asserting that the vote had been stolen. His legal team pursued dozens of lawsuits in states where Trump lost, and courts repeatedly rejected claims of election fraud. At stake in the arguments over immunity is not only whether Smith's criminal case proceeds, but if it does, how far into election season it may be pushed. Trump would be required to appear in court during trials, which would limit his election appearances. That could also offer grist for his contention that the case is politically motivated. If the trial were delayed until after November's vote, and if Trump won, he would be able to have the federal charges against him dropped.


Recent Posts

See All

A daily report co-sponsored by Arizona State University, Criminal Justice Journalists, and the National Criminal Justice Association

bottom of page