Home Login/Logout Contact Us Site Map
About NCJAPolicies & PracticesEducation & EventsGovernment AffairsMember Services

Government Affairs
InfoLetters
Letters to Congress
Budget
Appropriations
Legislation
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
FAQS
Guidelines and Solicitations
Innovative Policy Ideas
How to Apply for Funds
Important Links
Webinars
Risk Assessment
Byrne/JAG Reauthorization
Adam Walsh Act
9/11 Commission Bill
Second Chance Act
Status of Legislation Chart
Congressional Scorecard
Funding Information
Advocacy Materials

Best Practices and Policy Ideas for Funding

Below is a series of policy papers offering ideas for programs that could be funded using money from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The papers cover a number of topics and programs including: Project Safe Neighborhoods, justice IT infrastructure, reentry, combating meth, prescription drug abuse, justice reinvestment, mortgage fraud and home foreclosures, terrorism prevention, community courts, community prosecution, Data Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety and the National Motor Vehicle Title Information System.

• Combating Meth Production and Use • Justice IT Infrastructure Spending
• Justice Reinvestment • Mortgage Fraud and Home Foreclosures
• NMVTIS • Offender Reentry
• Prescription Drug Abuse • Implementing PSN
• Implementing PSN within Public Housing • Terrorism Prevention
• DDACTS • Community Prosecution
• Community Courts

To view the full policy paper, click the link for each title.

Combating Methamphetamine Production and Use
The methamphetamine crisis, which began more than 20 years ago in western and southwestern regions of the country, is now affecting all areas of the United States and continues to move further eastward. Methamphetamine can easily be made in clandestine laboratories from relatively inexpensive—and legal—over-the-counter ingredients and can be purchased at a relatively low cost. There are multiple problems associated with methamphetamine production, distribution, and clean-up.  In addition, methamphetamine is a highly addictive and destructive drug that requires intensive treatment responses. The U.S. Department of Justice and Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), in coordination with the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and other domestic and international law enforcement agencies, continue to work together to fight the manufacturing, trafficking, and use of this dangerous drug and to support local and state law enforcement partners in this fight.

In 2005, Congress passed the CombatMeth Act and many states passed laws which placed limits on the amount of pseudoephedrine and ephedrine sales (the precursor chemicals used to make methamphetamine).  While there was an initial dramatic decrease in domestic meth production as a result of the increased regulation of the sale and use of precursor and essential chemicals used in meth production, recent numbers have shown an increase in the number of domestic labs and use. People are getting creative using a technique often referred to as “smurfing” to get around the purchase limits of the precursor chemicals. They are using different individuals to purchase from multiple stores in multiple counties in order to get the supplies they need for production.

 Return to Top

Justice IT (Infrastructure) Funding
Funding investments in Justice IT infrastructure that support voice and data communications can assist the economy in creating jobs and reducing inventories but also help to make America safer from the threats of gangs, guns, drugs and terrorist attacks by addressing the number one priority of the 911 Commission Report of sharing public safety and homeland security information. These efforts can, with the proper planning and the use of standards make significant progress toward finally overcoming the issue identified in the 9-1-1 Report of “why we can not share” and why we cannot connect the dots.

Return to Top

Justice Reinvestment
In the past 20 years, state spending on corrections has grown at a rate faster than nearly any other state budget item. Despite increasing corrections expenditures, recidivism rates remain high with half of all persons released from prison or jail returning within three years. Further, in every state, there are a handful of “high-stakes” communities to which most people released from prison return. These are also the communities where taxpayer-funded programs are disproportionately focused. The goals of justice reinvestment are increasing public safety, reducing spending on corrections and improving conditions in the neighborhoods to which most people released from prison return.

Return to Top

Combating Mortgage Fraud and Home Foreclosures
As recent news reports have indicated and justice and community representatives have reported, the number of vacant and abandoned properties in communities across the U.S. has increased, and mortgage fraud and foreclosures are reported to play a key role in the issue. Vacant and abandoned properties often become unsightly, diminish the property values of surrounding homes and communities, and invite criminal activity into these communities. Mitigating the effects of these problems, reducing the frequency of these occurrences, and restoring these properties to productive use can play a significant role in reducing and preventing neighborhood crime.

Return to Top

National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS)
The Anti-Car Theft Act of 1992 directed the U.S. Department of Transportation to establish a national information system enabling states and others to access automobile titling information. In 1996, the Act was reauthorized and transferred to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ.) NMVTIS is a DOJ system operated by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA).  NMVTIS is an electronic system that enables users to access and verify key automobile titling information, as well as brand history (such as junk, salvage, or flood.) Users include State titling agencies, law enforcement officials, consumers, auto recyclers, salvage and junk yards, and insurance carriers.

Return to Top

Offender Reentry
State and local officials are joining federal government leaders in focusing unprecedented attention on the millions of people released from state prisons and local jails each year. Constituents in these communities know that the lack of affordable housing, drug and mental health treatment, jobs, and positive role models, undermine efforts to make individuals’ transition from corrections institutions to the community safe and successful.   Although government plays an important role in trying to address these problems, it cannot take them on alone.  Service providers based in the neighborhoods where people released from prison and jail return know best how to access local resources to help former prisoners rejoin communities and families in positive ways.  They are a tremendously valuable partner if government agencies can better engage them in prisoner reentry efforts.  Comprehensive offender reentry programs support strategies to deliver pre- and post-release assessments and services, and to develop transition plans in collaboration with criminal justice and corrections agencies and faith- or community-based organizations.

Return to Top

Prescription Drug Abuse on the Rise
The non-medical use of prescription drugs is a serious public health concern. According to the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), approximately 49.8 million Americans aged 12 or older reported non-medical use of any psychotherapeutic at some point in their lifetimes. Nearly 7 million Americans aged 12 or older reported current (past month) use of psychotherapeutic drugs for non-medical purposes. The National Drug Intelligence Center's 2006 National Drug Threat Survey (NDTS) shows that 78.8% of state and local law enforcement agencies reported either high or moderate availability of illegally diverted pharmaceuticals. While prescription drugs account for the second most commonly abused category of drugs, behind marijuana, many people benefit from the appropriate use of prescription pain killers. Prescription drug abuse poses a unique challenge because of the need to balance prevention, education, and enforcement, with the need for legitimate access to controlled prescription drugs.

Return to Top

Implementing Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN)
Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) is a nationwide commitment to reduce gun and gang crime in America by networking existing local programs that target anti-gang and gun related crimes and providing these programs with additional tools necessary to be successful. Since its inception in 2001, approximately $2 billion has been committed to this initiative.

This funding is being used to hire new federal and state prosecutors, support investigators, provide training, distribute gun lock safety kits, deter juvenile gun crime, and develop and promote community outreach efforts as well as to support other gun and gang violence reduction strategies.

Starting in 2007, a significant component of PSN has been the Department of Justice (DOJ) PSN Anti-Gang Training. This training is delivered by DOJ law enforcement agencies and other criminal justice professionals. Among a wide ranging agenda, intervention, prevention, suppression, and reentry strategies are presented, as well as a executive session to identify and develop strategic responses, a briefing on national and regional gang trends, a community gang problem assessment, and tips for working with cooperating witnesses and confidential informants.

Return to Top

Implementing Project Safe Neighborhood within Public Housing
Through their PSN efforts, many jurisdictions find that public housing continues to be one of the most difficult environments in which to reduce gun and gang violence.  Residents of public housing comprise a diverse population and inhabit a diverse range of property types.

In general these environments tend to consist of high concentrations of individuals facing poverty, transiency, barriers to employment, and a culture of fear, silence, and anti-police sentiments - circumstances that result in higher levels of violent and drug crime and lower levels of lasting, positive community-police relationships.

Despite these barriers to success, programs and agencies throughout the country continue to implement effective responses and strategies to reduce violent crime in public housing.

Return to Top

Terrorism Prevention
Although the debate continues as to whether home-grown groups (Sageman) or foreign terror organizations (Hoffman) pose the greatest threat to America, there is widespread agreement that the threat of terror is immediate and persistent.   Al Qaeda still seeks to launch attacks within the United States and domestic groups continue to recruit and organize.  The threat from foreign operatives may increase if the “third generation” of jihadists (Abu Mus’ab al-Suri) are no longer are drawn to the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.  In addition, the election of President Obama has created unrest and anger in some domestic extremist groups.

Return to Top

Data-Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety
Data-Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety (DDACTS) integrates location-based crime and traffic data to establish effective and efficient methods for deploying law enforcement and other resources. Using geomapping to identify areas that have high incidences of crime and crashes, DDACTS uses traffic enforcement strategies that play a dual role in fighting crime and reducing crashes and traffic violations. Drawing on the deterrent of highly visible traffic enforcement and the knowledge that crime often involves the use of motor vehicles, the goal of DDACTS is to reduce the incidence of crime, crashes, and traffic violations across the country.

Return to Top

Community Prosecution
Community prosecution (CP) involves a long-term, proactive partnership among the prosecutor's office, law enforcement, the community and public and private organizations, whereby the authority of the prosecutor's office is used to solve problems, improve public safety and enhance the quality of life of community members. Under this emerging philosophy, prosecutors are viewed not just as officers of the court who come on scene once a crime has occurred, but rather as members of the community who have the power to stop crime from occurring. This community-oriented prosecution has become not just a new program, but a new strategy for prosecutors. Community prosecutors use tools such as nuisance abatement, drug-free and prostitute-free zones, restorative justice, community courts, gun reduction programs, truancy abatement, and graffiti cleanup to improve neighborhood safety.

BJA supports the National Center for Community Prosecution (NCCP) through it partnership with the National District Attorneys Association’s American Prosecutors Research Institute and the Center for Court Innovation, conducting workshops and trainings, making site visits, and providing peer-to-peer mentoring.  These efforts support implementation of new CP sites and sustain and expand current CP efforts.  BJA and its partners develop publications and newsletters that highlight best-practices and creative solutions for implementing and sustaining community prosecution across the nation.

Return to Top

Community Courts
BJA in partnership with the Center for Court Innovation (CCI), under its’ problem-solving courts initiative supports training and technical assistance for community courts.  Community courts seek to apply a problem-solving approach to specified neighborhoods or designated cases (e.g., misdemeanors), working hand in hand with local residents, businesses, government agencies and community organizations. Research has shown that the community court model can reduce crime and substance abuse, increase services to victims, and improve public confidence in justice. 

Community courts are neighborhood-focused courts that attempt to harness the power of the justice system to address local problems. They can take many forms, but all focus on creative partnerships and problem solving. They strive to create new relationships, both within the justice system and with outside stakeholders such as residents, merchants, churches and schools. And they test new and aggressive approaches to public safety rather than merely responding to crime after it has occurred.

Return to Top